CASE STUDY ON EK RUKA HUA FAISLA

But at times when a group confronts an unforeseen problem which hinders the further interaction of the group it can result in the dissolution of the group. Leaders are those who possess certain qualities like ability to influence others, ability to command respect for their decisions etc. Social Integration and Influence Social integration refers to the acceptance of the members in the group and how they fit together. Cultural differences among the group member result in the slow development of group culture. Juror 5 Subhash Udghate:

Sometimes, Conflicts can involve in the communication process. Thischaracterdoes not shy away from voicing his opinions and likes to maintain decorum during thediscussions. And this is done without even identifying any of them as belonging to any race or religion, to the extent that they are just referred to as jury one, jury two and so on. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Forming In the forming stage, personal relations are categorized by dependence. People may get attracted to the groups for various reasons like:

In between we can see that the washroom becomes a place where people use coercive stjdy and is also a kind of sanctuary for some. Ek Ruka Hua Faisla is a movie about 19 year old boy who was a suspect for murder of his father. Juror 3 Pankaj Kapoor: The one guy who is not fully convinced manages to change the vote of one other jury member who is the oldest in the room. Eleven jury members are convinced that the boy is guilty of the crime and the task before them is to reach a unanimous decision to expedite the case.

Ek ruka hua faisla case study

Take away from the movieThere is overall change on the total group after having the long the discussion on the subject. He is the old and wise juror who proves to be open to difference inopinions and supports them.

  CTTS CASE STUDY MILESTONE 2 SOLUTION

The Juror 11 in the entire movie seems not interested in whatever is going on and gets confused in the end a bit and he changes his vote twice. What differentiates all these men from the protagonist Jury No. Group dynamics does summarise the processes taking place in a group but it also studies these processes scientifically.

Communication can be verbal, non- verbal or written. At thebeginning, he is the only member of the jury who votes not guilty’ and caze stands all thepressure from the other jury members. Probably he is the only juror who understood his role and played it very well.

Sub group formation can affect the interaction patterns in different ways.

Case study on Power of Communication by movie – Ek ruka hua faisla

Influence of the group members over each other Satisfaction from the group Perseverance for the attainment of the goals Goal attainment Apart from the positive outcomes cohesion has negative effects also. The word dynamics with respect to a group summarizes the interaction between the members of the group, the impact of group structures on the actions of group members, the diversity of the group, the way in which groups become cohesive and the ability of the group to change over time.

The group becomes oriented towards the task and the ground rules are established.

case study on ek ruka hua faisla

That is, he showed respect to elders, others and theirpersonal life. But finally, he speaks up about some evidencethat bothered him.

The judge further informs them that a guilty verdict will be accompanied by a mandatory death sentence. His bitter experience with his son has led him to this strong bias against the boy under trial.

The Best Way to demonstrate Group Process – Ek Ruka hua Faisla (1986)

huw There are also a few who have good analytical skills and have conjured up lots of facts and data. And this is done without even identifying any of them faiisla belonging to any race or religion, to the extent that they are just referred to as jury one, jury two and so on. There are other alternative models like cyclical models which are preferred by many over the stage theory propounded by Tuckman.

  ROBIN PESCH DISSERTATION

He again showsa mix of charismatic and a follower in his decision making style and was a victim of the status quobias like most other characters in this movie. Cohesiveness in a group satisfies the needs of the members in that group. Remember me on this computer. Social Service Review, The story begins in a courtroom where a teenage boy from a city slum is on trial for stabbing his father to death. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, Interaction patterns can be of many types like: The group has to be mature enough to enter into task- performance phase.

There is also a positive correlation between satisfaction of the group members and cohesion among them. They hadto reach a consensus, unanimously, regarding the boys fate guilty or not guilty. Effects of cohesion on the group:. Also whenever some decisions are taken as a team then the focus should be stud taking theviewpoints of everybody and collectively coming to a decision rather than focusing on expressingonly individual viewpoints and influencing others as well.

case study on ek ruka hua faisla

A group can reach this stage unexpectedly or in a planned manner.